根据不同的场景,apolloconfig部署的架构会有很多种,这里不讨论细节,仅从部署架构的宏观角度,来介绍各种部署的方案
用flowchart来表达部署方式,这里先介绍一些基本的概念
依赖关系用
graph LR
1 --> 2
表示1依赖2,也就是2必须存在,1才可以正常工作,例如
flowchart LR
应用 --> MySQL
表示应用需要使用MySQL才可以正常工作
依赖关系可能会比较复杂,以及存在多层级的依赖,例如
flowchart LR
服务A --> 注册中心
服务A --> 服务B --> MySQL
服务A --> Redis
服务A需要注册中心,服务B,Redis
并且服务B需要MySQL
包含关系用
graph
subgraph a
b
end
表示a包含b,也就是b是a的一部分,包含关系可能会出现嵌套的情况,例如
flowchart LR
subgraph Linux-Server
subgraph JVM1
Thread1.1
Thread1.2
end
subgraph JVM2
Thread2.1
end
MySQL
Redis
end
表示在一台Linux服务器上,运行着MySQL,Redis,2个JVM,JVM里分别又存在Thread
单机部署的场景通常是新手学习,或者公司内部对性能要求不高的测试环境,不适用于生产环境
这是最简单,部署起来最方便的单机部署方式
需要:
如下图,所有模块部署在同一台Linux机器上,总共有3个JVM进程
flowchart LR
m[Meta Server]
e[Eureka]
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server
subgraph JVM8080
m
e
c
end
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
c --> configdb
a --> configdb
p --> portaldb
JVM8080:对外暴露的网络端口是8080,里面有Meta Server,Eureka,Config Service,其中Config Service又使用了ConfigDB
JVM8090:对外暴露的网络端口是8090,里面有Admin Service,并且Admin Service使用了ConfigDB
JVM8070:对外暴露的网络端口是8070,里面有Portal,并且Portal使用了PortalDB
如果加入模块之间的依赖,flowchart会变成
flowchart LR
m[Meta Server]
e[Eureka]
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server
subgraph JVM8080
m
e
c
end
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
c --> configdb
a --> configdb
p --> portaldb
m --> e
c --> e
a --> e
p --> m
p --> a
Config Service和Admin Service会把自己注册到Eureka上
Portal通过Meta Server服务发现Admin Service
为了flowchart看起来更加简洁,可以只表示进程之间的依赖关系
flowchart LR
m[Meta Server]
e[Eureka]
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server
subgraph JVM8080
m
e
c
end
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
JVM8080 --> configdb
JVM8090 --> configdb
JVM8070 --> portaldb
JVM8090 --> JVM8080
JVM8070 --> JVM8090
进程JVM8070依赖进程JVM8090和PortalDB
进程JVM8090依赖进程JVM8080和ConfigDB
进程JVM8080依赖ConfigDB
3个JVM进程也可以分散到3台Linux机器上
需要:
2个database
flowchart LR
m[Meta Server]
e[Eureka]
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server 1
subgraph JVM8080
m
e
c
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 2
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 3
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
JVM8080 --> configdb
JVM8090 --> configdb
JVM8070 --> portaldb
JVM8090 --> JVM8080
JVM8070 --> JVM8090
不过通常我们会把Config Service和Admin Service部署在一台Linux服务器上
需要:
2个database
flowchart LR
m[Meta Server]
e[Eureka]
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server 1
subgraph JVM8080
m
e
c
end
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 2
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
JVM8080 --> configdb
JVM8090 --> configdb
JVM8070 --> portaldb
JVM8090 --> JVM8080
JVM8070 --> JVM8090
后续为了flowchart更简洁,将JVM8080里的内容进行简化,只显示Config Service,里面的Meta Server和Eureka不再显示
flowchart LR
subgraph JVM8080
m[Meta Server]
e[Eureka]
c[Config Service]
end
subgraph new-JVM8080[JVM8080]
new-c[Config Service]
end
JVM8080 --> |simplify| new-JVM8080
所以部署架构可以简化表示成
flowchart LR
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server 1
subgraph JVM8080
c
end
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 2
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
JVM8080 --> configdb
JVM8090 --> configdb
JVM8070 --> portaldb
JVM8090 --> JVM8080
JVM8070 --> JVM8090
单个环境基本没法满足实际的应用场景,例如公司里有SIT测试环境和UAT测试环境,此时需要部署2个环境提供配置服务
很容易想到的部署架构如下,把单机,单环境的部署架构重复2次即可
需要:
4个database
flowchart LR
subgraph SIT
c1[SIT Config Service]
a1[SIT Admin Service]
p1[SIT Portal]
configdb1[(SIT ConfigDB)]
portaldb1[(SIT PortalDB)]
subgraph SIT Linux Server
subgraph sit-jvm-8080[SIT JVM8080]
c1
end
subgraph sit-jvm-8090[SIT JVM8090]
a1
end
subgraph sit-jvm-8070[SIT JVM8070]
p1
end
end
sit-jvm-8080 --> configdb1
sit-jvm-8090 --> configdb1
sit-jvm-8070 --> portaldb1
sit-jvm-8090 --> sit-jvm-8080
sit-jvm-8070 --> sit-jvm-8090
end
subgraph UAT
c2[UAT Config Service]
a2[UAT Admin Service]
p2[UAT Portal]
configdb2[(UAT ConfigDB)]
portaldb2[(UAT PortalDB)]
subgraph UAT Linux Server
subgraph uat-jvm-8080[UAT JVM8080]
c2
end
subgraph uat-jvm-8090[UAT JVM8090]
a2
end
subgraph uat-jvm-8070[UAT JVM8070]
p2
end
end
uat-jvm-8080 --> configdb2
uat-jvm-8090 --> configdb2
uat-jvm-8070 --> portaldb2
uat-jvm-8090 --> uat-jvm-8080
uat-jvm-8070 --> uat-jvm-8090
end
但是这种方案,会存在2个Portal界面,没法1个界面管理2个环境,使用体验不是很好,Portal实际上可以只部署1套,推荐的部署架构如下
3个database:1个PortalDB + 1个SIT的ConfigDB + 1个UAT的ConfigDB
flowchart LR
p[Portal]
portaldb[PortalDB]
p --> portaldb
subgraph Portal Linux Server
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
subgraph SIT
c1[SIT Config Service]
a1[SIT Admin Service]
configdb1[(SIT ConfigDB)]
subgraph SIT Linux Server
subgraph sit-jvm-8080[SIT JVM8080]
c1
end
subgraph sit-jvm-8090[SIT JVM8090]
a1
end
end
sit-jvm-8080 --> configdb1
sit-jvm-8090 --> configdb1
sit-jvm-8090 --> sit-jvm-8080
end
subgraph UAT
c2[UAT Config Service]
a2[UAT Admin Service]
configdb2[(UAT ConfigDB)]
subgraph UAT Linux Server
subgraph uat-jvm-8080[UAT JVM8080]
c2
end
subgraph uat-jvm-8090[UAT JVM8090]
a2
end
end
uat-jvm-8080 --> configdb2
uat-jvm-8090 --> configdb2
uat-jvm-8090 --> uat-jvm-8080
end
JVM8070 --> sit-jvm-8090
JVM8070 --> uat-jvm-8090
假设现在需要满足SIT、UAT、PP这3个环境的使用场景,
在之前双环境的基础之上,再多加1台PP环境的Linux服务和ConfigDB即可,Portal通过修改配置的方式,来管理这3个环境
flowchart LR
p[Portal]
portaldb[PortalDB]
p --> portaldb
subgraph Portal Linux Server
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
subgraph SIT
c1[SIT Config Service]
a1[SIT Admin Service]
configdb1[(SIT ConfigDB)]
subgraph SIT Linux Server
subgraph sit-jvm-8080[SIT JVM8080]
c1
end
subgraph sit-jvm-8090[SIT JVM8090]
a1
end
end
sit-jvm-8080 --> configdb1
sit-jvm-8090 --> configdb1
sit-jvm-8090 --> sit-jvm-8080
end
subgraph UAT
c2[UAT Config Service]
a2[UAT Admin Service]
configdb2[(UAT ConfigDB)]
subgraph UAT Linux Server
subgraph uat-jvm-8080[UAT JVM8080]
c2
end
subgraph uat-jvm-8090[UAT JVM8090]
a2
end
end
uat-jvm-8080 --> configdb2
uat-jvm-8090 --> configdb2
uat-jvm-8090 --> uat-jvm-8080
end
subgraph PP
c3[PP Config Service]
a3[PP Admin Service]
configdb3[(PP ConfigDB)]
subgraph PP Linux Server
subgraph pp-jvm-8080[PP JVM8080]
c3
end
subgraph pp-jvm-8090[PP JVM8090]
a3
end
end
pp-jvm-8080 --> configdb3
pp-jvm-8090 --> configdb3
pp-jvm-8090 --> pp-jvm-8080
end
JVM8070 --> sit-jvm-8090
JVM8070 --> uat-jvm-8090
JVM8070 --> pp-jvm-8090
原理同上,每个环境1台Linux服务器+1个ConfigDB
然后Portal添加新环境的信息即可
1个环境只有1个Config Service进程,无法满足高可用,为了避免单点宕机后影响系统的可用性,需要多实例部署,也就是部署多个Java进程在不同的Linux服务器上
回到常见的非高可用部署方式,
flowchart LR
c[Config Service]
a[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
subgraph Linux Server 1
subgraph JVM8080
c
end
subgraph JVM8090
a
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 2
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
JVM8080 --> configdb
JVM8090 --> configdb
JVM8070 --> portaldb
JVM8090 --> JVM8080
JVM8070 --> JVM8090
当Linux Server 1宕机时,client就只能读取本地磁盘上的config-cache了,如果需要防止单台Linux宕机导致Config Service不可用,可以尝试再新增1台Linux机器
需要
2个database
flowchart LR
c-1[Config Service]
c-2[Config Service]
a-1[Admin Service]
a-2[Admin Service]
p[Portal]
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
JVM8080-1[JVM8080]
JVM8080-2[JVM8080]
JVM8090-1[JVM8090]
JVM8090-2[JVM8090]
subgraph Linux Server 1.1
subgraph JVM8080-1[JVM8080]
c-1
end
subgraph JVM8090-1[JVM8090]
a-1
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 1.2
subgraph JVM8080-2[JVM8080]
c-2
end
subgraph JVM8090-2[JVM8090]
a-2
end
end
subgraph Linux Server 2
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
JVM8080-1 --> configdb
JVM8090-1 --> configdb
JVM8080-2 --> configdb
JVM8090-2 --> configdb
JVM8070 --> portaldb
JVM8090-1 --> JVM8080-1
JVM8090-2 --> JVM8080-2
JVM8070 --> JVM8090-1
JVM8070 --> JVM8090-2
这种部署方式下,Linux Server 1.1 或者 Linux Server 1.2宕机,系统仍旧可用,
在上述的基础上,如果client的数量有很多(例如上万个Java进程),可以横向扩展Config Service,引入Linux Server 1.3, Linux Server 1.4, ...
Admin Service由于只有Portal访问,在数量上可以比Config Service少很多
具体如何评定Config Service的数量,请参考 Apollo性能测试报告
如2.3 单机,双环境种,如果想让SIT和UAT都变成高可用,只需要分别在环境中再添加机器即可,如下图,每个环境中各有2台Linux Server,如果有性能上需求,可以再在每个环境中,使用更多的机器来部署Config Service即可
flowchart LR
p[Portal]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
p --> portaldb
subgraph Portal Linux Server
subgraph JVM8070
p
end
end
subgraph SIT
sit-c1[SIT Config Service]
sit-a1[SIT Admin Service]
sit-c2[SIT Config Service]
sit-a2[SIT Admin Service]
sit-configdb[(SIT ConfigDB)]
subgraph SIT Linux Server 2.1
subgraph sit-c1-jvm-8080[SIT JVM8080]
sit-c1
end
subgraph sit-c1-jvm-8090[SIT JVM8090]
sit-a1
end
end
subgraph SIT Linux Server 2.2
subgraph sit-c2-jvm-8080[SIT JVM8080]
sit-c2
end
subgraph sit-c2-jvm-8090[SIT JVM8090]
sit-a2
end
end
sit-c1-jvm-8080 --> sit-configdb
sit-c1-jvm-8090 --> sit-configdb
sit-c2-jvm-8080 --> sit-configdb
sit-c2-jvm-8090 --> sit-configdb
sit-c1-jvm-8090 --> sit-c1-jvm-8080
sit-c2-jvm-8090 --> sit-c2-jvm-8080
end
subgraph UAT
uat-c1[UAT Config Service]
uat-a1[UAT Admin Service]
uat-c2[UAT Config Service]
uat-a2[UAT Admin Service]
uat-configdb[(UAT ConfigDB)]
subgraph UAT Linux Server 2.1
subgraph uat-c1-jvm-8080[UAT JVM8080]
uat-c1
end
subgraph uat-c1-jvm-8090[UAT JVM8090]
uat-a1
end
end
subgraph UAT Linux Server 2.2
subgraph uat-c2-jvm-8080[UAT JVM8080]
uat-c2
end
subgraph uat-c2-jvm-8090[UAT JVM8090]
uat-a2
end
end
uat-c1-jvm-8080 --> uat-configdb
uat-c1-jvm-8090 --> uat-configdb
uat-c2-jvm-8080 --> uat-configdb
uat-c2-jvm-8090 --> uat-configdb
uat-c1-jvm-8090 --> uat-c1-jvm-8080
uat-c2-jvm-8090 --> uat-c2-jvm-8080
end
JVM8070 --> sit-c1-jvm-8090
JVM8070 --> sit-c2-jvm-8090
JVM8070 --> uat-c1-jvm-8090
JVM8070 --> uat-c2-jvm-8090
在上述的基础上,如果要添加一个环境,例如BETA环境,需要新增2台及以上的Linux服务器+1个ConfigDB
Portal添加新环境的信息,指向BETA环境的apollo.meta
实际生产环境中,很多公司和测试环境进行了隔离,所以生产环境属于单环境,只有一个PRO环境
在只有1个机房时,参考 3.2 高可用,单环境
如果有2个机房,通常机房之间存在网络隔离,如果是同城机房,idc1和idc2,可以采用如下的部署方式
flowchart LR
idc1-p[idc1 Portal]
idc2-p[idc2 Portal]
portaldb[(PortalDB)]
idc1-p --> portaldb
idc2-p --> portaldb
configdb[(ConfigDB)]
idc1-c1-jvm-8080 --> configdb
idc1-c1-jvm-8090 --> configdb
idc1-c2-jvm-8080 --> configdb
idc1-c2-jvm-8090 --> configdb
idc2-c1-jvm-8080 --> configdb
idc2-c1-jvm-8090 --> configdb
idc2-c2-jvm-8080 --> configdb
idc2-c2-jvm-8090 --> configdb
subgraph idc1
subgraph idc1 Portal Linux Server
subgraph idc1-JVM8070
idc1-p
end
end
idc1-c1[idc1 Config Service]
idc1-a1[idc1 Admin Service]
idc1-c2[idc1 Config Service]
idc1-a2[idc1 Admin Service]
subgraph idc1 Linux Server 2.1
subgraph idc1-c1-jvm-8080[idc1 JVM8080]
idc1-c1
end
subgraph idc1-c1-jvm-8090[idc1 JVM8090]
idc1-a1
end
end
subgraph idc1 Linux Server 2.2
subgraph idc1-c2-jvm-8080[idc1 JVM8080]
idc1-c2
end
subgraph idc1-c2-jvm-8090[idc1 JVM8090]
idc1-a2
end
end
idc1-c1-jvm-8090 --> idc1-c1-jvm-8080
idc1-c2-jvm-8090 --> idc1-c2-jvm-8080
end
subgraph idc2
subgraph idc2 Portal Linux Server
subgraph idc2-JVM8070
idc2-p
end
end
idc2-c1[idc2 Config Service]
idc2-a1[idc2 Admin Service]
idc2-c2[idc2 Config Service]
idc2-a2[idc2 Admin Service]
subgraph idc2 Linux Server 2.1
subgraph idc2-c1-jvm-8080[idc2 JVM8080]
idc2-c1
end
subgraph idc2-c1-jvm-8090[idc2 JVM8090]
idc2-a1
end
end
subgraph idc2 Linux Server 2.2
subgraph idc2-c2-jvm-8080[idc2 JVM8080]
idc2-c2
end
subgraph idc2-c2-jvm-8090[idc2 JVM8090]
idc2-a2
end
end
idc2-c1-jvm-8090 --> idc2-c1-jvm-8080
idc2-c2-jvm-8090 --> idc2-c2-jvm-8080
end
idc1-JVM8070 --> idc1-c1-jvm-8090
idc1-JVM8070 --> idc1-c2-jvm-8090
idc2-JVM8070 --> idc2-c1-jvm-8090
idc2-JVM8070 --> idc2-c2-jvm-8090
每个机房有自己的一套Portal, Config Service, Admin Service
对于ConfigDB,在同城双机房下,连接的ConfigDB是同一个,不存在2个不同的ConfigDB,对于PortalDB也是如此,需要连接同一个
ConfigDB和PortalDB在图中没有放入idc1或者idc2,需要自行选用合适的MySQL架构以及部署方式
@lyliyongblue 贡献的样例部署图(建议右键新窗口打开看大图):